-
- Suraj Dhanjani, Majd Marrache, Varun Puvanesarajah, Jina Pakpoor, and Amit Jain.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
- World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb 1; 146: e972-e978.
BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is increasing in the pediatric population. Advanced imaging, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, performed for LBP imposes significant costs with little benefit. We investigated annual trends and demographic and geographic variation in spinal imaging for first-time pediatric presenters with LBP in primary care clinics.MethodsWe queried a private administrative claims database for patients presenting with LBP who underwent plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging from 2011 to 2017. We used a Cochrane Armitage test of trend to determine significant annual variation in diagnostic imaging utilization during the study period. The χ2 test was used to determine demographic and geographic variation.ResultsThe study included 67,423 patients with mean age 15.2 ± 3 years. There was no significant change in radiography (34.8% in 2011 vs. 35.5% in 2017, P = 0.795) or computed tomography (1.6% in 2011 vs. 1.1% in 2017, P = 0.073), but there was a significant increase in magnetic resonance imaging (3.3% in 2011 vs. 4.5% in 2017, P = 0.017). Overall, there was no significant change in total imaging use (P = 0.895). Boys had higher rates of imaging compared with girls (40.2% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001). Imaging rates significantly varied between regions across the United States (P < 0.001). The Midwest had the highest imaging rates (41%), while the Northeast had the lowest rates (31%).ConclusionsThere was significant demographic and geographic variation but no significant annual change in total diagnostic spinal imaging for pediatric patients with LBP between 2011 and 2017, with rates of advanced imaging remaining relatively low.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.