• J Thorac Dis · May 2020

    Predicting the rate of oxygen consumption during the 3-minute constant-rate stair stepping and shuttle tests in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    • Hayley Lewthwaite, Emily M Koch, Magnus Ekström, Alan Hamilton, Jean Bourbeau, François Maltais, Benoit Borel, and Dennis Jensen.
    • Clinical Exercise and Respiratory Physiology Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Faculty of Education, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
    • J Thorac Dis. 2020 May 1; 12 (5): 2489-2498.

    BackgroundThe 3-minute constant-rate stair stepping (3-min CRSST) and constant-speed shuttle tests (3-min CSST) were developed to assess breathlessness in response to a standardized exercise stimulus. Estimating the rate of oxygen consumption (V'O2) during these tests would assist clinicians to relate the stepping/shuttle speeds that elicit breathlessness to daily physical activities with a similar metabolic demand. This study: (I) developed equations to estimate the V'O2 of these tests in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); and (II) compared the newly developed and American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) metabolic equations for estimating the V'O2 of these tests.MethodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of people with COPD who completed a 3-min CRSST (n=98) or 3-min CSST (n=69). Multivariate linear regression estimated predictors (alpha <0.05) of V'O2 to construct COPD-specific metabolic equations. The mean squared error (MSE) of the COPD-specific and ACSM equations was calculated and compared. Bland-Altman analyses evaluated level of agreement between measured and predicted V'O2 using each equation; limits of agreement (LoA) and patterns of bias were compared.ResultsStepping rate/shuttle speed and body mass were identified as significant predictors of V'O2. The MSE of the COPD-specific equations was 0.05 L·min-1 for both tests. Mean difference between measured and predicted V'O2 was 0.00 L·min-1 (95% LoA -0.46, 0.46) and 0.00 L·min-1 (95% LoA -0.44, 0.44) for the 3-min CRSST and 3-min CSST, respectively. For the ACSM metabolic equations, the MSE was 0.10 L·min-1 and 0.18 L·min-1 for the 3-min CRSST and 3-min CSST, respectively. The ACSM metabolic equations underestimated V'O2 of the 3-min CRSST by -0.18 L·min-1 (95% LoA -0.68, 0.32), and overestimated V'O2 of the 3-min CSST by 0.35 L·min-1 (95% LoA -0.14, 0.84).ConclusionsThis study presents metabolic equations to predict V'O2 of the 3-min CRSST and 3-min CSST for people with COPD that are more accurate than the ACSM metabolic equations.2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.