• Ann. Intern. Med. · Mar 2021

    Probability of Success and Timelines for the Development of Vaccines for Emerging and Reemerged Viral Infectious Diseases.

    • Amanda MacPherson, Nora Hutchinson, Oliver Schneider, Elisabeth Oliviero, Emma Feldhake, Charlotte Ouimet, Jacky Sheng, Fareed Awan, Catherine Wang, Jesse Papenburg, Nicole E Basta, and Jonathan Kimmelman.
    • Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.M., N.H., O.S., E.O., E.F., C.O., J.S., F.A., C.W., J.K.).
    • Ann. Intern. Med. 2021 Mar 1; 174 (3): 326-334.

    BackgroundAnticipated success rates and timelines for COVID-19 vaccine development vary. Recent experience with developing and testing viral vaccine candidates can inform expectations regarding the development of safe and effective vaccines.ObjectiveTo estimate timelines and probabilities of success for recent vaccine candidates.DesignClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify trials testing viral vaccines that had not advanced to phase 2 before 2005, and the progress of each vaccine from phase 1 through to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensure was tracked. Trial characteristics were double-coded. (Registration: Open Science Framework [https://osf.io/dmuzx/]).SettingTrials launched between January 2005 and March 2020.ParticipantsPreventive viral vaccine candidates for 23 emerging or reemerged viral infectious diseases.MeasurementsThe primary end point was the probability of vaccines advancing from launch of phase 2 to FDA licensure within 10 years.ResultsIn total, 606 clinical trials forming 220 distinct development trajectories (267 343 enrolled participants) were identified. The probability of vaccines progressing from phase 2 to licensure within 10 years was 10.0% (95% CI, 2.6% to 16.9%), with most approvals representing H1N1 or H5N1 vaccines. The average timeline from phase 2 to approval was 4.4 years (range, 6.4 weeks to 13.9 years). The probabilities of advancing from phase 1 to 2, phase 2 to 3, and phase 3 to licensure within the total available follow-up time were 38.2% (CI, 30.7% to 45.0%), 38.3% (CI, 23.1% to 50.5%), and 61.1% (CI, 3.7% to 84.3%), respectively.LimitationsThe study did not account for preclinical development and relied primarily on ClinicalTrials.gov and FDA resources. Success probabilities do not capture the varied reasons why vaccines fail to advance to regulatory approval.ConclusionSuccess probabilities and timelines varied widely across different vaccine types and diseases. If a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is licensed within 18 months of the start of the pandemic, it will mark an unprecedented achievement for noninfluenza viral vaccine development.Primary Funding SourceMcGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity (MI4) Emergency COVID-19 Research Funding program.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.