• Mehmet Oguz Sahin, Volkan Sen, Sakir Ongun, Bora Irer, and Guner Yildiz.
• Department of Urology, Manisa State Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.
• Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021 Apr 1; 75 (4): e13866.

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the efficacy of silodosin and a terpene combination in the treatment of distal ureteral stones.MethodologyThe data of the patients admitted to the urology policlinic with renal colic, diagnosed with distal ureteral stones, and followed up with medical expulsive therapy between December 2017 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 72 patients that received 8 mg/day silodosin and Group 2 consisted of 51 patients that were given three capsules of a terpene combination daily. The groups were compared in terms of the patients' demographic characteristics, medical history, localisation of the present stone, renal collecting system status, daily fluid intake, number of emergency service visits, number of additional analgesic applications needed, number of pain attacks, number of days off work, stone expulsion rate and time to stone expulsion.ResultsOf the total 123 patients, 98 (79.7%) were stone-free. The stone-free rate was 75.0% in Group 1 and 86.3% in Group 2, with no statistical difference between the two groups. However, the number of visits to the emergency service because of pain, number of additional analgesic applications required, number of days off work, and time to stone expulsion were statistically significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1.ConclusionsThe treatment of distal ureteral stones with silodosin is as effective as the terpene combination. However, the terpene combination is more effective than silodosin in managing pain and accelerating stone expulsion.© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

13 keywords...

hide…