• John Fang.
• University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
• Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep 1; 98 (9): 2097-8.

AbstractThe purpose of the study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass in the treatment of severe obesity (body mass index > 40). A deterministic decision analysis that compared the lifetime expected costs and outcomes between open gastric bypass and no treatment of severe obesity from the payer perspective was performed. Men and women between the ages of 35 and 55 yr, with body mass index between 40 and 50 kg/m(2), who did not have cardiac disease and who failed conservative treatment, including pharmacotherapy, were included. Cost-effectiveness ratio of the base case conditions was made with parameter estimates from the literature and expert discussion and expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were performed on selected variables. Gastric bypass was not cost-saving, because the reduction in lifetime medical costs was less than the cost of treatment in any subgroup. The base case cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from 5,400 US dollars to 16,100 US dollars for women and from 10,700 US dollars to 35,600 US dollars per QALY for men. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that in older, less obese men, the cost effectiveness ratio was responsive to the amount of weight lost, obesity-related quality of life, and complication rates. Parameter variation did not significantly affect cost-effectiveness ratios in the remaining patients. The authors concluded that gastric bypass is a cost-effective alternative to no treatment in the severely obese, at less than 50,000 US dollars per QALY.

17 keywords...

hide…