• J Pediatr Orthop · Oct 2017

    Comparative Study

    Elastic Intramedullary Nailing Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures.

    • Andrew T Pennock, Tracey P Bastrom, and Vidyadhar V Upasani.
    • *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California †Department of Orthopedics, Rady Children's Hospital and Health Center, San Diego, CA.
    • J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Oct 1; 37 (7): e403-e408.

    BackgroundThe optimal fixation strategy for unstable pediatric tibia fractures is unclear with some favoring elastic intramedullary nails (EIN) and others favoring plate and screws [open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)]. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and complications of skeletally immature patients undergoing surgical stabilization of the tibia with either EIN or ORIF.MethodsA retrospective review was performed on all patients undergoing EIN or ORIF of a diaphyseal fracture at a single pediatric level I trauma center between 2010 and 2016. Patients were included if they had open growth plates, no intra-articular or physeal involvement, and radiographic follow-up until union. Patient demographic, injury, radiographic, and surgical data were recorded. Outcome measures included achievement of union, time to healing, residual deformity, complications, need for additional procedures, and return to sport. Statistical analysis was performed with alpha set at P<0.05.ResultsA total of 70 patients met inclusion, 44 underwent EIN and 26 underwent ORIF. There were no significant differences between demographics or injury variables between groups other than ORIF patients having more distal fractures (44% vs. 32%; P=0.006). At a mean follow-up of 1.4 years, 97% of fractures healed and there was no difference in healing rates between groups. The mean time to union was 15 weeks. ORIF patients had a shorter cast duration (7 vs. 10 wk; P<0.001), less angular deformities >5 degrees (15% vs. 41%; P=0.03), and lower rates of subsequent surgery (35% vs. 91%; P<0.001), but trended toward longer operating room times (69 vs. 59 min; P=0.06), and higher rates of wound complications (23% vs. 9%; P=0.10). Regardless of surgical technique, nearly all patients returned to full activities with no significant deficits.ConclusionsSurgical stabilization of unstable pediatric tibia fractures with ORIF or EIN constructs lead to predictable healing in the majority of patients. Complications can occur and differ based on surgical approach. ORIF led to more anatomic reductions and lower rates of second surgeries, but trended toward higher rates of wound-related complications and slightly longer operating room times.Level Of EvidenceLevel III-therapeutic study.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.