-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Dec 2010
ReviewReview of successful litigation against english health trusts in the treatment of adults with orthopaedic pathology: clinical governance lessons learned.
- Amit Atrey, C M Gupte, and S A Corbett.
- Department of Orthopaedics, Guy's Hospital, St. Thomas' Street, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, England. amitatrey@doctors.net.uk
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 15; 92 (18): e36.
BackgroundReviewing litigation brought against health institutions is a clinical governance issue and can help to prevent further cases. While large-scale databases are rare, the British National Health Service Litigation Authority deals with claims brought against all public health trusts in England.MethodsWe reviewed all 2312 successful cases pertaining to adult orthopaedic claims between 2000 and 2006 in an effort to establish trends of litigation and highlight specific areas of concern such that orthopaedic health care could be potentially improved. A total of 1473 entries had sufficient detail to be considered in our study.ResultsThere were 4,847,841 elective and trauma-related orthopaedic procedures performed between 2000 and 2006 in the United Kingdom. Compared with the number of cases performed, the frequency of successful litigation is relatively low but financially costly to the National Health Service. From 2000 to 2006, a total of more than US$321,695,072 was paid in adult orthopaedic surgery-related settlements. The most common reason for successful litigation was due to the presence and sequelae of infection (123 cases). In the remaining cases, successful litigation appeared to be related to two common themes: the consent process and the mismanagement of orthopaedic conditions, particularly fractures, cauda equina syndrome, and compartment syndrome.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the fact that education and vigilance remain important components of orthopaedic training as many of the cases of successful litigation had a preventable cause.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.