• J Emerg Med · Jan 2021

    Observational Study

    Point of Care Ultrasound Use by Associate Providers for Differentiating Abscess Versus Cellulitis Skin and Soft Tissue Infection in the Emergency Department.

    • George Knaysi, Jeanie Ringelberg, Nick Stadlberger, and Zachary Soucy.
    • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Emergency Department, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
    • J Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 1; 60 (1): e1-e7.

    BackgroundSkin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a common complaint in the ambulatory setting and pose a significant burden on the health care system.ObjectivesWe sought to determine the accuracy of ultrasound for detecting soft tissue abscesses by emergency medicine associate providers (APs).MethodsThis was a prospective observational study of adult patients with suspected SSTI in the emergency department of a rural tertiary care academic medical center. The AP performed and interpreted point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the suspected infected area. Ultrasound images and interpretation were reviewed by the attending emergency physician with either rejection or agreement of the image interpretation, diagnosis, and management. If incision and drainage was performed, presence or absence of purulent drainage was recorded.ResultsSixty-four patients with suspected SSTI were enrolled: 29 had POCUS-proven abscesses and 33 had cellulitis; 2 were excluded. AP clinical evaluation alone for identifying abscess revealed sensitivity of 92.3 (74.9-99.1), specificity of 67.7 (49.5-82.6), positive predictive value of 68.6 (57.0-78.2), and negative predictive value of 92.0 (81.4-100). The use of POCUS by APs in addition to clinical examination demonstrated sensitivity of 96.2 (80.4-99.9), specificity of 93.9 (79.8-99.3), positive predictive value of 92.6 (76.5-98.0), and negative predictive value of 96.9 (81.9-99.5). p values were <0.05 for test characteristics. Ultrasound results changed SSTI management decisions in 10 of 62 (16.1%) patients, with the most common change being a new incision and drainage or needle aspiration. Agreement of the POCUS interpretation between APs and attending physicians was 96.8% with a κ of 0.94 (0.85-1.00).ConclusionWith modest training, APs can successfully use POCUS to identify abscesses in patients in the emergency department with SSTIs. POCUS increases the ability to rule in the diagnosis and changes management in a clinically relevant number of patients with SSTIs.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…