• Naokado Ikeda, Hiroki Toda, Misaki Yamamoto, Shin-Ichi Kanemaru, Masatsune Ishikawa, and Koichi Iwasaki.
• *Departments of Neurosurgery and ‡Otolaryngology, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute and Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
• Neurosurgery. 2015 Sep 1;11 Suppl 3:382-6.

BackgroundA surgical procedure for glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) was selected from microvascular decompression, glossopharyngeal and upper vagal rhizotomy, or a combination of these procedures based on the presence of arteries compressing the glossopharyngeal and vagal rootlets. The offending artery is usually a main trunk or branch of the cerebellar arteries. A perforating artery is a known but uncommon variation of the offending artery that causes GPN. The appropriate procedure for such cases is unknown.ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical significance of the perforating artery in GPN, we describe 2 patients with a perforating artery compressing the rootlet, and its mobilization relieved neuralgia. We examined the validity of decompressing a perforating artery as an alternative to rhizotomy in such cases.MethodsWe independently reviewed 12 GPN patients treated with microvascular decompression. The patients' pain severity, medication doses, preoperative imaging studies, intraoperative findings, and outcomes were examined.ResultsEleven patients had neurovascular compression of the glossopharyngeal nerve. In 2 of the patients, a perforating artery compressed the rootlet, thereby generating an indentation and creating a discoloration of the rootlet. Mobilizing the perforating artery with no additional rhizotomy provided complete pain relief with no significant complications and allowed the discontinuation of medications.ConclusionEven a small perforating artery can cause GPN when it compresses the rootlet. In such cases, mobilization of the perforating artery with no additional rhizotomy is an effective surgical option.

39 keywords...

hide…