-
- Amanda Walden, Kendall Cortelyou-Ward, Meghan Hufstader Gabriel, and Alice Noblin.
- Department of Health Management and Informatics, College of Health & Public Affairs, University of Central Florida, 528 W Livingston St, Ste 401, Orlando, FL 32801. Email: amanda.walden@ucf.edu.
- Am J Manag Care. 2020 Dec 1; 26 (12): e395-e402.
ObjectivesThe study's objectives were to explore the impact of personal/organizational knowledge, prior breach status of organizations, and framed scenarios on the choices made by privacy officers regarding the decision to report a breach.Study DesignA survey was completed of 123 privacy officers who are members of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA).MethodsThe study used primary data collection through a survey. Individuals listed as privacy officers within the AHIMA were the target audience for the survey. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and predicted probabilities were used to analyze the data collected.ResultsThe percentage of privacy officers who chose to report a breach to the Office for Civil Rights varied by scenario: scenario 1 (general with little information), 39%; scenario 2 (4-factor risk assessment, paper records), 73.2%; scenario 3 (4-factor risk assessment, ransomware case), 91.9%. Several factors affected the response to each scenario. In scenario 1, privacy officers with a Certified in Healthcare Privacy and Security (CHPS) credential were less likely to report; those who previously reported a prior breach were more likely to report. In scenario 2, privacy officers with a bachelor's degree or graduate education were less likely to report; those who held the CHPS or coding credential were less likely to report.ConclusionsStudy findings show there are gray areas where privacy officers make their own decisions, and there is a difference in the types of decisions they are making on a day-to-day basis. Future guidance and policies need to address these gaps and can use the insight provided by the results of this study.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.