• Lishuang Wei, Hailun Xie, and Ping Yan.
• Geriatric Respiratory Disease Ward, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 11; 99 (50): e23486.

BackgroundThis meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in malignancy based on existing evidence.MethodsWe searched for relevant literature published in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase before April 10, 2020. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and pooled to evaluate the relationship between SIRI and malignancy outcomes.ResultsWe included 14 articles, describing 6,035 patients. Our findings revealed that patients with high SIRI had worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.85-2.62, P < .001), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.49-2.48, P < .001), time-to-progression (TTP) (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.55-2.58, P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.38-2.16, P < .001), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR: 3.57, 95% CI: 2.25-5.68, P < 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46 - 2.72, P < .001), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) (HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.28-3.99, P = .005) than patients with low SIRI. The correlation between SIRI and OS did not change in a subgroup analysis. Meta-regression indicated that heterogeneity may be related to differences in primary therapy strategies. Sensitivity analysis suggested that our results were reliable.ConclusionsSIRI could be used as a useful predictor of poor prognosis during malignancy treatment.

14 keywords...

hide…