• Yanbin Teng, Yan Zhang, and Baojie Li.
• Department of Orthopedics and Trauma.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 11; 99 (50): e23515.

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is gradually emerging as the treatment of choice for end-stage osteoarthritis. In the past, intravenous (IV) versus oral acetaminophen (APAP) treatment is still a controversial subject in TKA. Therefore, we write this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of IV versus oral APAP on pain and recovery after TKA.MethodsEmbase, Pubmed, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies were included in our meta-analysis. Five studies that compared IV APAP groups with oral APAP groups were included in our meta-analysis. The research was reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure the reliability and verity of results.ResultsPooled results indicated that no significant difference between the IV APAP groups and oral APAP groups in term of VAS score at 24 hours (P = .67), 48 hours (P = 0.08), and total morphine consumption at 24 hours (P = .07), but there was a significant difference in terms of length of hospital stay (LOS) (P = .0004).ConclusionIV APAP was not found to be superior to oral APAP in patients undergoing TKA in terms of VAS scores at 24 hours, 48 hours, and total morphine consumption at 24 hours. However, it can significantly reduce the LOS. We still need a large of high-quality research to verify the relationship between the oral and the IV APAP to give the conclusion.

27 keywords...

hide…