• Katherine Hawkridge, Ikhlaaq Ahmed, and Zubair Ahmed.
• Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb 1; 48 (1): 647-657.

PurposeSpinal collars were introduced in 1967 into the management of spinal trauma care as it was thought that this technique of immobilisation would prevent any further neurological or spinal damage in high-risk patients. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether the use of spinal collars in the pre-hospital trauma patient was recommended by published literature.MethodsA systematic search of the literature was conducted between 1990 and 2020, screening PubMed, Medline, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The consequent findings were then qualitatively synthesised with the aim of effectively evaluating the evidence to resolve the discrepancy between current practice and literature.ResultsOf the nine eligible studies, six deemed that spinal collars should not be used in pre-hospital trauma patients with the remaining three reporting uncertainty if spinal collars were best practice. Our results suggest that there is a discrepancy between current guidance and practice in that although the guidelines recommend the use of spinal collars in the pre-hospital setting the majority of the studies were against the use of spinal collars. Importantly, none of the studies reported any benefits of spinal collars.ConclusionOur study shows a disparity between current guidelines and the published literature and warrants further direct research to obtain a more comprehensive view of the use of spinal collars in a pre-hospital setting.© 2020. The Author(s).

11 keywords...

hide…