• Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis (Miami) · Nov 2020

    InforMing the PAthway of COPD Treatment Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy (Fluticasone Furoate/ Umeclidinium/ Vilanterol) Versus Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol and Umeclidinium /Vilanterol in Patients With COPD: Analysis of the Western Europe and North America Regions.

    • Arnaud Bourdin, Gerard Criner, Gilles Devouassoux, Mark Dransfield, Halpin David M G DMG College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom., MeiLan K Han, C Elaine Jones, Ravi Kalhan, Peter Lange, Sally Lettis, David A Lipson, David A Lomas, José M Echave-Sustaeta María-Tomé, Neil Martin, Fernando J Martinez, Holly Quasny, Lynda Sail, Thomas M Siler, Dave Singh, Byron Thomashow, Henrik Watz, Robert Wise, and Nicola A Hanania.
    • Department of Pneumology and Addictology, University of Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
    • Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis (Miami). 2020 Nov 5.

    BackgroundThe IMPACT trial demonstrated lower moderate/severe exacerbation rates with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a history of exacerbations. Since IMPACT was a global study, post-hoc analyses were conducted by geographic region to investigate potential differences in overall findings.MethodsIMPACT was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Patients with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25µg, FF/VI 100/25µg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25µg. Endpoints assessed in the overall, Western Europe (WE) and North America (NA) populations included on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation (rates and time-to-first), trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score. Safety was assessed.ResultsOverall, 10,355 patients were enrolled, 3164 from WE, 2639 from NA. FF/UMEC/VI significantly reduced on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI in WE (rate ratios 0.82 [95%CI 0.74-0.91], P<.001 and 0.76 [0.67-0.87], P<.001) and NA (0.87 [0.77-0.97], P=.014 and 0.69 [0.60-0.80], P<.001). FF/UMEC/VI reduced time-to-first moderate/severe exacerbation and improved lung function versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI in both regions, and improved SGRQ total score in WE, but not NA. Safety profiles were generally similar between treatment groups/regions; the inhaled corticosteroid class effect of increased pneumonia incidence was seen in NA but not WE.ConclusionConsistent with intent-to-treat results, FF/UMEC/VI reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rate and risk and improved lung function in WE and NA; however, between-regions differences were seen for SGRQ total score and pneumonia incidence.JCOPDF © 2020.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…