• K Markstaller, B Eberle, and W F Dick.
• Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Bern, Schweiz. klaus.markstaller@insel.ch
• Anaesthesist. 2004 Oct 1; 53 (10): 927-36.

AbstractA decade after the onset of a discussion whether ventilation could be omitted from bystander basic life support (BLS) algorithms, the state of the evidence is reevaluated. Initial animal studies and a prospective randomized patient trial had suggested that omission of ventilation during the first minutes of lay cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) did not impair patient outcomes. More recent studies demonstrate, however, that this may hold true only in very specific scenarios, and that the chest compression-only technique was never superior to standard BLS. Instead of calling basics of BLS training and practice into question, more and better training of lay persons and professionals appears mandatory, and targeted use of dispatcher-guided telephone CPR should be evaluated and, if it improves outcome, it should be encouraged. Future studies should focus much less on the omission but on the optimization of ventilation under the specific conditions of CPR.

13 keywords...

hide…