• Neurosurgery · Aug 2015

    135 Imaging Patterns Predict Patient Survival and Molecular Subtype in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning Techniques.

    • Jared M Pisapia, Luke Macyszyn, Hamed Akbari, Xiao Da, V Pigrish, Mark Andrew Attiah, Yingtao Bi, Sharmistha Pal, Ramana Davaluri, Laura Roccograndi, Nadia Dahmane, George Biros, Ronald L Wolf, Michel Bilello, Donald M OʼRourke, and Chrristos Davatzikos.
    • Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug 1;62 Suppl 1:209.

    IntroductionSeveral studies have examined correlates between imaging features of neoplasm and patient survival or tumor genetic composition; however, few have generated predictive models robust enough to enter clinical practice. In this study, we use advanced pattern analysis and machine learning to identify a combination of imaging features on initial magnetic resonance (MR) images to predict overall survival and molecular subtype in patients with glioblastoma (GB).MethodsWe performed a retrospective followed by a prospective cohort study of GB patients. Imaging features were extracted from structural, diffusion, and perfusion MR images at time of diagnosis. A machine-learning algorithm was used to examine multiple features simultaneously to determine which set of features was most predictive of survival. The model was tested prospectively in a separate cohort of patients. In a subset of patients for which genetic data were obtained, machine learning was used to classify the likelihood of molecular subtype affiliation based on imaging. Tenfold cross-validation was performed.ResultsThe accuracy of the model in predicting survival was 77% in the retrospective study (n = 105) and 79% in the prospective study (n = 29). Constellations of imaging markers related to infiltration and diffusion of tumor cells into edema, microvascularity, and blood-brain barrier compromise were predictive of shortened survival. A separate model was generated to predict molecular subtype. The accuracy of individual subtype predictions was 85% for classical (n = 20), 84% for mesenchymal (n = 28), 88% for neural (n = 29), and 86% for proneural (n = 22).ConclusionUnlike prior studies, we analyzed the entirety of imaging data in an integrative fashion, leveraging the power of pattern analysis and machine learning to predict survival and molecular subtype with high accuracy and reproducibility in GB. Our noninvasive model utilizes multiparametric imaging obtained routinely for GB patients, making it readily translatable to the clinic.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…