• Neurosurgery · Aug 2015

    145 A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.

    • Gurpreet Surinder Gandhoke, Han-Moe Shin, Yue-Fang Chang, Zachary J Tempel, David O Okonkwo, Peter C Gerszten, and Adam S Kanter.
    • Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug 1;62 Suppl 1:212-3.

    IntroductionBoth transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) are effective surgical interventions for patients with degenerative lumbar spondylosis. We sought to compare health care costs by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and, thereby, the difference in the total cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for TLIF vs LLIF for the treatment of degenerative spondylosis. We further calculated the thresholds for minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum cost-effective difference (MCED) for patient-reported outcome measures at 2-year follow-up.MethodsForty-five patients who underwent single-level TLIF and 29 patients who underwent single-level stand-alone LLIF for degenerative spondylosis with low back and leg pain were included. All costs from diagnosis through 2-year postsurgical follow-up were available from a comprehensive single-center data bank within a unified hospital system. Total cost to the third-party payer for all spine-related medical resource use from the time of diagnosis through 2 years was recorded. QALYs were calculated from EQ-5D collected in an unbiased manner by a nonclinical staff member. Difference in total cost per QALY gained for LLIF minus that for TLIF was assessed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.ResultsSignificant improvements were observed at 2-year follow-up for both TLIF and LLIF utilizing SF36PCS, ODI, VAS BP, VAS LP, and EQ-5D. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculations revealed similar mean cumulative QALYs gained at the 2-year interval (0.67 for TLIF and 0.60 for LLIF; P = .331). Median total cost of care following TLIF and LLIF was $44 068 and $45 574, respectively; (P = .960). MCED thresholds with an anchor of <$50 000/QALY were higher than MCID thresholds for all patient-reported outcome measures. Total mean cost and EQ-5D were statistically equivalent between the 2 treatment groups.ConclusionTLIF and LLIF produced equivalent 2-year patient outcomes at an equivalent cost-effectiveness profile.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,704,841 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.