• Junyoung Ahn, Ehsan Tabaraee, Daniel D Bohl, Khaled Aboushaala, and Kern Singh.
• *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; and †Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
• Spine. 2015 Sep 15; 40 (18): E1025-30.

Study DesignRetrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained registry.ObjectiveTo compare the intraoperative variables, surgical outcomes, and narcotic utilization between primary and revision 1-level minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar discectomies.Summary Of Background DataRevision spine surgery may be associated with longer procedural time and greater soft tissue disruption. Few studies have analyzed the surgical outcomes and narcotic utilization associated with MIS revision lumbar discectomies.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 227 consecutive cases of MIS 1-level lumbar discectomy for degenerative spinal pathology between 2009 and 2014 by a single surgeon was performed. Patients were stratified into primary and revision cohorts. Demographics, comorbidity, intraoperative parameters, peri- and postoperative outcomes, and reoperations were assessed. Postoperative narcotic utilization was compared between cohorts. Statistical analyses were performed using Student t-test and Pearson χ test. A P < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.ResultsOf the 227 cases included, 186 patients (81.9%) and 41 patients (18.1%) were included in the primary and revision cohorts, respectively. Demographics, comorbidity, smoking status, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and estimated blood loss did not differ between cohorts. However, the revision cohort demonstrated a longer procedural time, increased length of hospitalization, and higher postoperative narcotic utilization. Although not statistically significant, revision patients trended toward higher 6-week postoperative VAS scores and reherniation rates. In addition, revision patients were more likely to undergo subsequent lumbar fusion than primary patients.ConclusionThe findings suggest that revision MIS lumbar discectomy may be associated with increased procedural time, increased length of hospitalization, and increased postoperative narcotic utilization. Whereas revision patients trended toward higher postoperative VAS scores at 6 weeks, both cohorts demonstrated similar pain levels at final follow-up. Finally, revision patients may be at a greater risk of reherniation and subsequent reoperation. Further studies are warranted to characterize the independent risk factors for a revision lumbar discectomy.Level Of Evidence3.

36 keywords...

hide…