• Jason M Cuellar, Anthony Petrizzo, Ravi Vaswani, Jeffrey A Goldstein, and John A Bendo.
• *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and †Division of spine surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY; and ‡NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
• Spine. 2015 May 1;40(9):629-35.

Study DesignCohort.ObjectiveTo compare the perioperative morbidity of patients with cardiac stents after spine surgery who continue to take aspirin before and after the operation with a similar group of patients who preoperatively discontinued aspirin.Summary Of Background DataThe preoperative discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy has been the standard of care for orthopedic surgical procedures. However, recent literature has demonstrated significant cardiac risk associated with aspirin withdrawal in patients with cardiac stents. Although it has recently been demonstrated that performing orthopedic surgery while continuing low-dose aspirin therapy seems to be safe, studies focused on spinal surgery have not yet been performed. Because of the risk of intraspinal bleeding and the serious consequences of subsequent epidural hematoma with associated spinal cord compression, spinal surgeons have been reluctant to operate on patients taking aspirin.MethodsThis institutional review board-approved study included 200 patients. Preoperative parameters and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed for 100 patients who underwent spinal surgery after the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy and 100 patients who continued to take daily aspirin through the perioperative period. The primary outcome measure was serious bleeding-related postoperative complications such as spinal epidural hematoma. The operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, transfusion of blood products, and 30-day hospital readmission rates were also recorded and compared.ResultsThe patients who continued taking aspirin in the perioperative period had a shorter hospital length of stay on average (4.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.2 ± 5.8; P < 0.005), as well as a reduced operative time (210 ± 136 vs. 266 ± 143; P < 0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in the estimated blood loss (642 ± 905 vs. 697 ± 1187), the amount of blood products transfused, overall intra- and postoperative complication rate (8% vs. 11%), or 30-day hospital readmission rate (5% vs. 5%). No clinically significant spinal epidural hematomas were observed in either of the study groups.ConclusionThe current study has observed no appreciable increase in bleeding-related complication rates in patients with cardiac stents undergoing spine surgery while continuing to take aspirin compared with patients who discontinued aspirin prior to surgery. Although very large studies will be needed to determine whether aspirin administration results in a small complication rate increase, the current study provides evidence that perioperative aspirin therapy is relatively safe in patients undergoing spinal surgery.Level Of Evidence2.

40 keywords...

hide…