-
- Remko Soer, Albère J A Köke, Bert L G N Speijer, Patrick C A J Vroomen, Rob J E M Smeets, Maarten H Coppes, Michiel F Reneman, Douglas P Gross, and Groningen Spine Study Group.
- *Groningen Spine Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands †Expertise Center of Health, Social Care and Technology, Saxion Universities of Applied Sciences, Enschede, the Netherlands ‡Department of Rehabilitation Medicine; Research School of CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands §Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands ¶Adelante Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation, Hoensbroek, the Netherlands ‖Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands **Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands; and ††Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
- Spine. 2015 May 1;40(9):E545-51.
Study DesignCross-sectional study.ObjectiveTo examine reference data for the Pain Disability Index (PDI) in Dutch and Canadian patient samples with a variety of musculoskeletal pain disorders and to test which potential factors are independently associated with the PDI score.Summary Of Background DataThe PDI is a widely used generic instrument for measuring disability related to pain. It is unknown whether patients with spinal and other musculoskeletal diagnoses have different levels of disability when scored on the PDI.MethodsPatients were referred to secondary and tertiary care centers in the Netherlands and Alberta, Canada, between 2009 and 2013. All patients filled out a baseline questionnaire including demographics and the PDI. After first consultation with a medical doctor, diagnoses were set by the medical specialist. Univariate general linear models were used to examine correlations between PDI scores and age, sex, country of residence, diagnosis, and work status.ResultsIn total 6997 patients were included in this study: 1302 Canadian and 5695 Dutch patients. Mean PDI score of the total group was 37.8 ± 14.2. Reference values are presented and clustered into the following diagnostic groups: spinal nerve and intervertebral disc disorders; nonspecific back pain; rheumatic soft-tissue pain (widespread pain or fibromyalgia); spinal stenosis; and whiplash-associated disorder. The PDI score was significantly and relevantly associated with pain intensity (η explained variance from 20% to 25%), but not relevantly associated with age, sex, country of residence, and diagnostic group (η<3%). In the working subgroup, adding "current sick leave" as covariate increased the explained variance to 34%.ConclusionReference values of the PDI are presented. Patient ratings of disability on the PDI are relevantly associated with pain intensity and work status, but not with nationality or diagnostic group. Only minimal differences were identified between the various musculoskeletal diagnoses included.Level Of EvidenceN/A.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.