-
- Peter C Warnke, Christoph B Ostertag, and Jonathan Hobbs.
- Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug 1;62 Suppl 1:231.
IntroductionThe treatment of craniopharyngiomas remains controversial in the absence of class I and class II data. Despite strong opinions advocating aggressive vs conservative approaches, few long-term outcome data exist. Conventional wisdom suspects drainage of craniopharyngioma cysts into the ventricle to cause aseptic meningitis/ventriculitis. We studied this approach systematically in a large group of patients followed for more than 15 years.MethodsPatients with mixed solid/cystic craniopharyngiomas were treated consistently with stereotactic cyst-ventricular shunt followed immediately by fractionated limited field radiotherapy (54 Gy). Multivariate analysis for prognostic variables was performed including cyst volume, visual outcome, endocrinological outcome, tumor control, overall survival and progression free survival. Visual and endocrinological outcome was assessed by an independent outside ophthalmologist/endocrinologist.ResultsFifty-one patients were included with a mean age of 12.6 + 4.8 years and a median follow-up of 17.5 + 4.3 years. Tumor control was achieved in 93.2% of patients and cyst volume showed a median reduction of 87% + 12%. Visual outcome showed improvement in 59%, stable disease in 39% and deterioration in 2%. Endocrinological deterioration requiring new substitution occurred in 4% with 86% stable endocrinological findings and 10% improvement of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis impairment compared to preoperative findings. Overall survival and progression free survival could not be calculated because of lack of events in the Kaplan-Meier plots. No cases of aseptic meningitis/ventriculitis were observed despite drainage of up to 80 mL of cyst fluid into the CSF.ConclusionThis is the largest series of craniopharyngiomas treated with cyst-ventricular shunting and radiotherapy with the longest follow-up. It shows that aseptic meningitis is vastly overestimated and a never event in this series. Long-term outcome of this approach is significantly superior to aggressive resection with concomitantly lower morbidity/mortality.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.