• Shifan Yan, Ting Yu, Fusheng Li, Yong Huang, Lu Xiao, Haiqun Li, and Maohong Wang.
• Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 18; 99 (51): e23043e23043.

IntroductionA large number of patients will experience pruritus after uremia. Medicine is the preferred treatment for many doctors, but the effectiveness and safety of different medicines for uremia pruritus has not yet been comprehensively compared, based on network meta-analysis.Methods And AnalysisAccording to the retrieval strategy, two team members independently searched the literature in 7 databases, and imported the retrieval results into the EndNote Software AQ8 (V.X9). After deleting repeated articles, they read the abstract and the full text, selected the articles that met the inclusion criteria and extracted valid information. The main results were visual analogue scale (VAS) and the secondary results were verbal rating scale (VRS), Dirk R Kuypers score, and adverse event incidence. The methodological quality evaluation was conducted from 7 aspects, according to The Cochrane Collaborative Tool, Stata Statistical Software (Version 14.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX) was used for data analysis. The level of evidence will be assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) instrument).ResultsThe results will rank the efficacy of drugs used to treat uremic pruritus and assess their safety.ConclusionThis study is the first to compare the efficacy and safety of medicines for uremic pruritus based on network analysis and will provide evidence and ideas for the treatment of uremic pruritus.Inplasy Registration NumberNo. INPLASY202090103.Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

28 keywords...

hide…