• Rifaquat Rahman, Kelly Hempfling, Andrew D Norden, David A Reardon, Lakshmi Nayak, Mikael L Rinne, Rameen Beroukhim, Lisa Doherty, Sandra Ruland, Arun Rai, Jennifer Rifenburg, Debra LaFrankie, Brian M Alexander, Raymond Y Huang, Patrick Y Wen, and Eudocia Q Lee.
• Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (R.R., A.D.N., D.A.R., L.N., M.L.R., R.B., B.M.A., R.Y.H., P.Y.W., E.Q.L.); Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts (K.H., A.D.N., D.A.R., L.N., M.L.R., R.B., L.D., S.R., J.R., D.L., P.Y.W., E.Q.L.); Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (A.D.N., D.A.R., L.N., M.L.R., R.B., P.Y.W., E.Q.L.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (B.M.A.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (R.Y.H.); Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (A.R.).
• Neuro-oncology. 2014 Nov 1; 16 (11): 1523-9.

BackgroundCurrently, there are no known effective treatments for recurrent glioblastoma once patients have progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen. We examined the efficacy of adding nitrosoureas to bevacizumab in patients who progressed while on an initial bevacizumab-containing regimen.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we identified adult patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) who were treated with lomustine or carmustine in combination with bevacizumab as a second or third regimen after failing an alternative initial bevacizumab-containing regimen. Response rate (RR), 6-month progression free survival (PFS6), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for each treatment.ResultsForty-two patients were identified (28 males) with a median age of 49 years (range, 24-78 y). Of 42 patients, 28 received lomustine (n = 22) or carmustine (n = 6) with bevacizumab as their second bevacizumab-containing regimen, and 14 received lomustine (n = 11) or carmustine (n = 3) as their third bevacizumab-containing regimen. While the median PFS for the initial bevacizumab-containing regimen was 16.3 weeks, the median PFS for the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen was 6.3 weeks. Patients had an RR of 44% and a PFS6 rate of 26% during the initial bevacizumab regimen and an RR of 0% and a PFS6 rate of 3% during the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen. There was increased grade 3-4 toxicity (45% vs 19%, P = .010) during the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen relative to the initial bevacizumab regimen. Median overall survival was 18.7 weeks from initiation of the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen.ConclusionThe addition of lomustine or carmustine to bevacizumab after a patient has already progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen does not appear to provide benefit for most patients and is associated with additional toxicity with the doses used in this cohort.© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

41 keywords...

hide…