• Liang Chye Goh, Balachandran Arvin, Abu Bakar Zulkiflee, and Narayanan Prepageran.
• 1 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
• Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct 1; 159 (4): 783-788.

AbstractObjective To objectively compare the nasal decongestion potency of lidocaine/phenylephrine when delivered with a nasal nebulizer and a nasal spray before a rigid nasoendoscopic examination. Study Design Open-label randomized controlled trial. Setting Multicenter study. Methods This prospective clinical trial involved 106 participants with untreated chronic rhinitis. Fifty-three participants had 400 μL of lidocaine/phenylephrine administered into the right nostril with a nasal nebulizer, while the remaining 53 participants had 400 μL administered with a nasal spray. The control was the left nostril. Nasal resistance at 150-Pa fixed pressure was evaluated with an active anterior rhinomanometry at 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes postintervention. Pain score was assessed subjectively by applying pressure to the inferior turbinate 30 minutes after intervention. Results There was an overall reduction in nasal resistance of the right nostril when lidocaine/phenylephrine was administered with the nasal nebulizer in comparison with the nasal spray. However, a statistically significant difference in nasal resistance was seen only at 5 minutes ( P = .047), 15 minutes ( P = .016), and 30 minutes ( P = .036). The examining endoscopist further supported the degree of nasal decongestion via subjective assessment of the nasal cavity ( P = .001). Pain scores obtained after the intervention showed a significant decrease in pain threshold when the nasal nebulizer was used instead of the nasal spray ( P = .040). Conclusions This study suggests that the delivery of lidocaine/phenylephrine to the nasal cavity by the nasal nebulizer provides better decongestive and analgesic potency as compared with the delivery by nasal sprays.

34 keywords...

hide…