• Ewout C van der Wal, Markus Klimek, Koen Rijs, Marjan Scheltens-de Boer, Karla Biesheuvel, and Biswadjiet S Harhangi.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
• World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar 1; 147: e516-e523.

BackgroundIntradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors (ID-EMSCT) make up 40% of all spinal neoplasms. Resection of these tumors is mostly conducted using intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). However, the literature shows heterogenous data on its added value for ID-EMSCT. The aim of this study is to define sensitivity and specificity of IONM in ID-EMSCT resection and to study possible correlations between preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables and neurologic outcomes after ID-EMSCT resection.MethodsData of patients undergoing ID-EMSCT surgeries with IONM from January 2012 until July 2019 were examined. Using neurologic status 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively, sensitivity and specificity for IONM were calculated. IONM test results and neurologic outcomes were paired to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters.ResultsData of 78 patients were analyzed. 6 weeks postoperatively, 14.10% of patients had worse neurologic status, decreasing to 9.84% 1 year postoperatively. Multimodal IONM showed a sensitivity of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.94) and a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66-0.87) after 6 weeks, and a sensitivity of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.54-1.00) and a specificity of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82) after 1 year.ConclusionsIONM yielded high to perfect sensitivity and high specificity. However, IONM signals did not always determine the extent of resection, and false-positive results did not always result in incomplete tumor resections, because of surgeons overruling IONM. Therefore, IONM cannot fully replace clinical judgment and other perioperative information.Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

28 keywords...

hide…