• Uttam K Bodanapally, Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan, Alexis R Boscak, Paul M Jaffray, Giulia Van der Byl, Ashis K Roy, David Dreizin, Thorsten R Fleiter, Stuart E Mirvis, Jaroslaw Krejza, and Bizhan Aarabi.
• Departments of 1 Radiology and.
• J. Neurosurg.. 2014 Nov 1;121(5):1275-83.

ObjectThe authors conducted a study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of helical CT angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in detecting intracranial arterial injuries after penetrating traumatic brain injury (PTBI).MethodsIn a retrospective evaluation of 48 sets of angiograms from 45 consecutive patients with PTBI, 3 readers unaware of the DSA findings reviewed the CTA images to determine the presence or absence of arterial injuries. A fourth reader reviewed all the disagreements and decided among the 3 interpretations. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CTA were calculated on a per-injury basis and in a subpopulation of patients with traumatic intracranial aneurysms (TICAs).ResultsSensitivity of CTA for detecting arterial injuries was 72.7% (95% CI 49.8%-89.3%); specificity, 93.5% (95% CI 78.6%-99.2%); PPV, 88.9% (95% CI 65.3%-98.6%); and NPV, 82.9% (95% CI 66.4%-93.4%). All 7 TICAs were correctly identified by CTA. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of CTA in detecting TICAs were 100%. To compare agreement with DSA, the standard of reference, confidence scores categorized as low, intermediate, and high probability yielded an overall effectiveness of 77.8% (95% CI 71.8%-82.9%).ConclusionsComputed tomography angiography had limited overall sensitivity in detecting arterial injuries in patients with PTBI. However, it was accurate in identifying TICAs, a subgroup of injuries usually managed by either surgical or endovascular approaches, and non-TICA injuries involving the first-order branches of intracranial arteries.

40 keywords...

hide…