-
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv · Jun 2010
Comparative StudyPrognostic benefit of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with medical therapy in patients with inoperable aortic stenosis.
- Ronak Rajani, William Buxton, Peter Haworth, Muhammed Z Khawaja, Manav Sohal, Roberta L Brum, Nevil Hutchinson, Adam de Belder, Uday Trivedi, and David Hildick-Smith.
- Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton, UK.
- Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun 1; 75 (7): 1121-6.
ObjectivesTo compare survival in patients with inoperable aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation against those managed medically.BackgroundWithout surgical correction, survival of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis is poor. It is unknown whether patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have a better prognosis than similar patients who are treated with medical management.MethodsSurvival rates were compared in consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who either underwent TAVI or continued on medical management following multidisciplinary team assessment. All patients had been turned down, or considered at unacceptably high risk, for conventional aortic valve surgery. Patients were reviewed in clinic or by telephone six monthly. Mortality data was obtained from the United Kingdom Office of National Statistics.ResultsThe study group included 85 patients aged 81 +/- 7 years (range 62-94), of whom 48 were male. Thirty eight patients underwent TAVI while 47 patients were deemed unsuitable based on echocardiographic, angiographic, or clinical criteria and remained on medical therapy. The calculated EuroSCORE for the TAVI group was 11 +/- 2 and for the medical group 9 +/- 2 (P < 0.001). TAVI-related procedural mortality was 2.6%, and 30-day mortality was 5.2%. Among the medically-treated patients, 14 (30%) underwent palliative balloon aortic valvuloplasty, with a trend toward improved survival (P = 0.06). During overall follow-up of 215 +/- 115 days there were a total of 18 deaths; TAVI N = 5 (13%); Medical N = 13 (28%) (P = 0.04).ConclusionsPatients with severe aortic valve disease who are not suitable for surgical aortic valve replacement have an improved prognosis if treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation rather than continuing on medical management alone.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.