-
Case Reports Comparative Study
Putting 'CSF-shift' edema hypothesis to test: Comparing cisternal and parenchymal pressures after basal cisternostomy for head injury.
- Nishant Goyal and Punit Kumar.
- Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India. Electronic address: drnishantgoyal@gmail.com.
- World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr 1; 148: e252-e263.
BackgroundIncreased brain edema in head injury is due to shift of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from cisterns at high pressure to brain parenchyma at low pressure. By opening basal cisterns and decreasing the increased cisternal pressure, basal cisternostomy (BC) results in reversal of CSF shift from parenchyma to cisterns, leading to decreased brain edema. Though the CSF-shift edema hypothesis is based on pressure difference between cisterns and brain parenchyma, the relationship of these pressures has not been studied.MethodsA prospective clinical study was conducted from November 2018 to March 2020 including adult patients with head injury who were candidates for standard decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC). All patients had neurological assessment and head computed tomography preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients underwent BC with DHC. Postoperatively, parenchymal and cisternal pressures and neurological condition were monitored hourly for 72 hours.ResultsNine (5 men, 4 women) patients with head injury (mean age, 45.7 years; range, 25-72 years) underwent DHC-BC. Median Glasgow Coma Scale score of patients at admission was 8 (range, 4-14), and median midline shift on computed tomography was 8 mm (range, 7-12 mm). There was a significant difference between opening (25.70 ± 10.48 mm Hg) and closing (11.30 ± 5.95 mm Hg) parenchymal pressures (t9 = 3.963, P = 0.003). Immediate postoperative cisternal pressure was 1-11 mm Hg and was lower than immediate postoperative parenchymal pressure in all except 1 patient. Postoperatively, if cisternal pressure remained low, parenchymal pressure also decreased, and patients showed clinical improvement. Patients showing increased cisternal pressure showed increased parenchymal pressure and clinical worsening.ConclusionsOur study supports the CSF-shift edema hypothesis. Following DHC-BC, cisternal pressure is lowered to near-atmospheric pressure, and its relationship to parenchymal pressure predicts the future course of patients by reversal or re-reversal of CSF shift.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.