• Radiology · Jun 2014

    Small (≤1-cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and imaging features at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

    • Mi Hye Yu, Jung Hoon Kim, Jeong-Hee Yoon, Hyo-Cheol Kim, Jin Wook Chung, Joon Koo Han, and Byung-Ihn Choi.
    • From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea (M.H.Y., J.H.K., J.H.Y., H.C.K., J.W.C., J.K.H., B.I.C.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (J.W.C., J.K.H., B.I.C.).
    • Radiology. 2014 Jun 1; 271 (3): 748-60.

    PurposeTo assess diagnostic performance and imaging features of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in small (≤1-cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection in patients with chronic liver disease.Materials And MethodsThe institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed consent. Sixty patients (56 men, four women; mean age, 60.1 years) with HCC (146 lesions; 70 > 1 cm, 76 ≤ 1 cm) underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. HCC was confirmed at surgical resection (72 lesions; 30 > 1 cm, 42 ≤ 1 cm) or by showing interval growth with typical enhancement patterns at follow-up dynamic computed tomography or MR imaging (74 lesions; 40 > 1 cm, 34 ≤ 1 cm). Two radiologists assessed MR imaging features and graded likelihood of HCC with a five-point confidence scale. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) method was used.ResultsMean JAFROC figure of merit for small HCC was 0.717; that for large (>1-cm) HCC was 0.973 with substantial agreement (κ = 0.676). Mean sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were 46.0% (70 of 152) and 48.3% (70 of 145) for small HCC versus 95.0% (133 of 140) and 78.2% (133 of 170) for large HCC, respectively. Eleven of 76 small HCCs (14%) were not seen on MR images, even after careful investigation. MR imaging features of small HCC included arterial enhancement (79%, 60 of 76), hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images (68%, 52 of 76), washout on 3-minute delayed phase images (50%, 38 of 76), hyperintensity on T2-weighted images (43%, 33 of 76), hypointensity on T1-weighted images (32%, 24 of 76), and restriction on diffusion-weighted images (28%, 20 of 72). Arterial enhancement and washout on 3-minute delayed phase images or hypointensity on HBP images occurred in 66% of small HCCs (50 of 76).ConclusionDiagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for small HCC detection is still low, with mean sensitivity of 46.0% (70 of 152) and mean PPV of 48.3% (70 of 145). By adding hypointensity on HBP images as washout, diagnostic performance for small HCC detection can be improved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.