• Radiology · Jan 2015

    Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging in the detection of HCCs and allocation of transplant recipients on the basis of the Milan criteria and UNOS guidelines: correlation with histopathologic findings.

    • Dong Ho Lee, Jeong Min Lee, Jee Hyun Baek, Cheong-Il Shin, Joon Koo Han, and Byung Ihn Choi.
    • From the Department of Radiology (D.H.L., J.M.L., J.H.B., C.i.S., J.K.H., B.I.C.) and Institute of Radiation Medicine (J.M.L., J.K.H., B.I.C.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
    • Radiology. 2015 Jan 1; 274 (1): 149-60.

    PurposeTo determine whether hepatobiliary phase ( HBP hepatobiliary phase ) imaging can improve the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas ( HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s) and to investigate the accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in the allocation of transplant recipients on the basis of the Milan criteria and United Network for Organ Sharing ( UNOS United Network for Organ Sharing ) guidelines.Materials And MethodsThis retrospective study had institutional review board approval; the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between June 2008 and June 2011, 63 patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) were included. All patients underwent a gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MR imaging examination of the liver that included HBP hepatobiliary phase images obtained 20 minutes after contrast material administration. Two abdominal radiologists independently assessed two MR imaging data sets to detect HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s: Set 1 included unenhanced and gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic images, and set 2 also included HBP hepatobiliary phase images. Patients were allocated into three groups: Those who did not meet the Milan criteria, those who did meet the Milan criteria with additional priority according to UNOS United Network for Organ Sharing guidelines, and those who did meet the Milan criteria without additional priority. Diagnostic performance of each data set in depicting HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s was compared by using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics ( JAFROC jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic s). Sensitivity and accuracy of patient allocation were compared by using generalized estimating equations.ResultsSixty-three HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s were found in 36 of 63 patients. Eight patients were classified as not meeting Milan criteria, 12 as meeting Milan criteria with additional priority, and 43 as meeting Milan criteria without additional priority. For the detection of HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s, reader-averaged figures of merit estimated with JAFROC jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic s were 0.761 for set 1 and 0.791 for set 2 (P < .001). Addition of HBP hepatobiliary phase images significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s, particularly 1-2-cm HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s (six [20.7%] vs 13 [44.8%] of 29 [P = .008] for reader 1 and eight [27.6%] vs 12 [41.4%] of 29 [P = .041] for reader 2). Accuracy of patient allocation was 88.9% for set 1 and 92.1% for set 2 (P = .151).ConclusionAddition of HBP hepatobiliary phase images can significantly improve the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging in the detection of 1-2-cm HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s in liver transplantation candidates. In addition, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging showed 92.1% accuracy in patient allocation on the basis of the Milan criteria and UNOS United Network for Organ Sharing guidelines.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.