-
Comparative Study
Comparison of standard and large forceps for transbronchial lung biopsy in the diagnosis of lung infiltrates.
- K P Wang, R A Wise, P B Terry, J Kaplan, E J Britt, E F Haponik, W R Summer, and B Marsh.
- Endoscopy. 1980 Jul 1; 12 (4): 151-4.
AbstractIn order to determine whether larger biopsy forceps improve the diagnostic yield over smaller standard forceps, we performed 30 transbronchial biopsy procedures in 28 patients with lung infiltrates using three types of instruments. We found that compared to the standard forceps specimens the large forceps acquired larger specimens in 22 of 29 procedures and that the alligator forceps acquired larger specimens in 7 of 10 procedures. However, in only 2 of the 29 procedures did the larger biopsy specimen alter the pathologic diagnosis. Four of the patients subsequently underwent open lung biopsy which did not alter the pathologic diagnosis rom the transbronchial biopsy procedure. We conclude that the large forceps do not significantly improve the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy in our patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.