• J Am Board Fam Med · Jan 2021

    Feasibility of Group Visits for Advance Care Planning Among Patients with Heart Failure and Their Caregivers.

    • Julia I Bandini, KoganAlexis CoulouridesACFrom RAND Corporation, Boston, MA (JIB); Department of Family Medicine and Geriatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Alhambra, CA (ACK, BO); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (JP, SCA); Department of, Bonnie Olsen, Jessica Phillips, Rebecca L Sudore, David B Bekelman, and Sangeeta C Ahluwalia.
    • From RAND Corporation, Boston, MA (JIB); Department of Family Medicine and Geriatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Alhambra, CA (ACK, BO); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (JP, SCA); Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California-San Francisco (RLS); San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA (RLS); Department of Medicine, Eastern Colorado VA Health Care System, Aurora, CO (DBB); Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at the Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (DBB).
    • J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan 1; 34 (1): 171-180.

    BackgroundGroup visits have the potential to help patients identify their health care values and engage in the emotionally and cognitively challenging task of advance care planning (ACP) in a resource-efficient manner by providing a forum for social learning and social support.ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of disease-specific group visits for patients with heart failure and their caregivers.DesignFeasibility trial of a 90-minute group visit held for 10 separate groups and led by a trained facilitator using the video-based PREPARE for Your Care ACP tool.Setting/SubjectsOlder adults with recent hospitalization for heart failure (n = 36; median age, 74 years) and their caregivers (n = 21).MeasurementsPre- and post-visit surveys and a postvisit telephone interview assessing perceived value and acceptability; structured nonparticipant observations to assess process and feasibility.ResultsMean scores from the postgroup visit evaluation showed that participants reported that they felt comfortable discussing ACP in a group (4.59), understood the information covered (4.70), and were able to identify and clarify their health care values (4.43). Interview and observation data demonstrated that participants were able to identify and clarify their preferences by listening and learning from a diverse range of perspectives in the group and that the disease-focused nature of the group visit created a supportive space for participants to share their experiences.ConclusionsDisease-focused ACP group visits were feasible to conduct and acceptable to participants, underscoring their value as an efficient intervention to engage patients and caregivers in the otherwise time- and resource-intensive task of ACP.© Copyright 2021 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.