• Gábor Veres, Martin Hagenhoff, Harald Schmidt, Tamás Radovits, Sivakkanan Loganathan, Yang Bai, Sevil Korkmaz-Icöz, Paige Brlecic, Alex Ali Sayour, Matthias Karck, and Gábor Szabó.
• Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: gaborveres@yahoo.com.
• Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Aug 1; 56 (2): 256-263.

ObjectivesIschaemia reperfusion (IR) injury occurs during vascular graft harvesting and implantation during vascular/cardiac surgery. Elevated intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) levels contribute to an effective endothelial protection in different pathophysiological conditions. The hypothesis that the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor vardenafil would protect vascular grafts against IR injury by upregulating the nitric oxide-cGMP pathway in the vessel wall of the bypass graft was investigated.MethodsLewis rats (n = 6-7/group) were divided into Group 1, control; Group 2, donor rats received intravenous saline; Group 3, received intravenous vardenafil (30 μg/kg) 2 h before explantation. Whereas aortic arches of Group 1 were immediately mounted in an organ bath, aortic segments of Groups 2 and 3 were stored for 2 h in saline and transplanted into the abdominal aorta of the recipient. Two hours after transplantation, the implanted grafts were harvested. Endothelium dependent and independent vasorelaxations were investigated. TUNEL, CD-31, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, α-SMA, nitrotyrosine, dihydroethidium and cGMP immunochemistry were also performed.ResultsCompared with the control, the saline group showed significantly attenuated endothelium dependent maximal relaxation (Rmax) 2 h after reperfusion, which was significantly improved by vardenafil supplementation (Rmax control, 91 ± 2%; saline 22 ± 2% vs. vardenafil 39 ± 4%, p < .001). Vardenafil pre-treatment significantly reduced DNA fragmentation (control 9 ± 1%, saline 66 ± 8% vs. vardenafil 13 ± 1%, p < .001), nitro-oxidative stress (control 0.8 ± 0.3, saline 7.6 ± 1.3 vs. vardenafil 3.8 ± 1, p = .036), reactive oxygen species level (vardenafil 36 ± 4, control 34 ± 2 vs. saline 43 ± 2, p = .049), prevented vascular smooth muscle cell damage (control 8.5 ± 0.7, saline 4.3 ± 0.6 vs. vardenafil 6.7 ± 0.6, p = .013), decreased ICAM-1 (control 4.1 ± 0.5, saline 7.0 ± 0.9 vs. vardenafil 4.4 ± 0.6, p = .031), and VCAM-1 score (control 4.4 ± 0.4, saline 7.3 ± 1.0 vs. vardenafil 5.2 ± 0.4, p = .046) and increased cGMP score in the aortic wall (control 11.2 ± 0.8, saline 6.5 ± 0.8 vs. vardenafil 8.9 ± 0.6, p = .016). The marker for endothelial integrity (CD-31) was also higher in the vardenafil group (control 74 ± 4%, saline 22 ± 2% vs. vardenafil 40 ± 3%, p = .008).ConclusionsThe results support the view that impairment of intracellular cGMP signalling plays a role in the pathogenesis of the endothelial dysfunction of an arterial graft after bypass surgery, which can effectively be prevented by vardenafil. Its clinical use as preconditioning drug could be a novel approach in vascular/cardiac surgery.Copyright © 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

50 keywords...

hide…