• Marco Freddolini, Siobhan Strike, and Raymond Lee.
• From the Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom.
• Spine. 2014 May 1;39(10):785-90.

Study DesignCross-sectional study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the dynamic stability and kinematics of the trunk during unstable sitting, and to determine the differences in these biomechanical parameters between healthy participants and participants with low back pain (LBP).Summary Of Background DataPatients with LBP exhibited alterations in trunk kinematics while performing different dynamic tasks and in static posture as a result of pain. It is not clear if changing in trunk motion may reduce postural control and the ability to perform a balancing task.MethodsTwenty-three participants with LBP and 31 healthy participants were requested to sit on a custom-made swinging chair and to regain the balance after tilting the chair backward for 10° and 20°. Lumbar spine, pelvis, and chair motions were recorded using FASTRAK sensors. The thoracolumbar curvature of all participants was also evaluated in the standing position. The angular displacement of the chair was fitted in an equation describing the underdamped second-order response to a step input.ResultsKinematic analysis showed that the hip range of motion increased whereas spine range of motion angle decreased in participants with LBP for both tilt angles (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 subject groups in the time required to regain balance, and the natural frequency and damping ratio of the kinematic equation. Lumbar lordosis significantly decreased in LBP group.ConclusionParticipants with LBP showed trunk postural and movement adaptations that seems to be compensatory strategies to decrease the risk of further injuries and aggravation of the symptoms, but their ability to regain the balance was not affected by LBP. Clinicians should encourage patients with LBP to remain active while they are experiencing pain.

24 keywords...

hide…