• Maccagnan Pinheiro BesenBruno AdlerBAMedical Intensive Care Unit, Disciplina de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo., TomaziniBruno MartinsBMHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo (SP), Brazil., and Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo.
• Medical Intensive Care Unit, Disciplina de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo.
• Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1; 34 (2): 107-112.

Purpose Of ReviewThe aim of this study was to review the most recent literature on mechanical ventilation strategies in patients with septic shock.Recent FindingsIndirect clinical trial evidence has refined the use of neuromuscular blocking agents, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres in septic shock patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Weaning strategies and devices have also been recently evaluated. The role of lung protective ventilation in patients with healthy lungs, while recognized, still needs to be further refined. The possible detrimental effects of spontaneous breathing in patients who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome is increasingly recognized, but clinical trial evidence is still lacking to confirm this hypothesis. A new concept of lung and diaphragm protective is emerging in the critical care literature, but its application will need a complex intervention implementation approach to allow adequate scrutiny of this concept and uptake by clinicians.SummaryMany advances in the management of the mechanically ventilated patient with sepsis and septic shock have occurred in recent years, but clinical trial evidence is still necessary to translate new hypotheses to the bedside and find the right balance between benefits and risks of these new strategies.Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…