• Der Anaesthesist · Dec 2012

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [Transcutaneous carbon dioxide measurements. Dynamics during hyperventilation in healthy adults].

    • L Bertram, S Stiel, and M Grözinger.
    • Abteilung für Palliativmedizin, HSK, Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik, Ludwig-Erhard-Str. 100, 65199 Wiesbaden, Deutschland. linda.bertram@hsk-wiesbaden.de
    • Anaesthesist. 2012 Dec 1;61(12):1027-35.

    BackgroundIn various fields of medicine the transcutaneous measurement (p(tc)CO₂) of carbon dioxide pressure (pCO₂) has been accepted as a reliable measuring method while for other disciplines the method has been doubted. Nevertheless, some minor therapeutic interventions, such as electroconvulsive therapy and breathing biofeedback used in psychiatry could benefit considerably from transcutaneous monitoring. The study presented here investigated the accuracy of transcutaneous measurement as compared to end-tidal (p(et)CO₂) and capillary (p(cap)CO₂) measurements in hyperventilation.MethodsIn this study 22 healthy volunteers underwent a hyperventilation procedure with assessment of p(tc)CO₂, p(et)CO₂, p(cap)CO₂, breathing and pulse rates. The three measurement methods of pCO₂ were compared pairwise by Bland-Altman diagrams before and at the end of hyperventilation. The time delay between p(et)CO₂ and p(tc)CO₂ was determined for each individual participant by a stepwise shifting the time course of p(et)CO₂ until an optimal congruence with p(tc)CO₂ was reached.ResultsThe study group consisted of 10 men and 12 women with a mean age of 30.5 ± 9.4 years. The experimental procedure lasted an average of 27.7 min including 1.9 min for the baseline measurement and 11.6 min for the actual hyperventilation procedure. The course of pCO₂ from baseline to the end of the hyperventilation phase and back to normal baseline followed a U-curve in all individuals. The pCO₂ could be reduced by a mean of approximately 45 % for the 3 measurement methods from the individual baseline of 35 mmHg. The breathing and pulse frequencies increased by 26.8 % and 17.3 %, respectively. A total of 91 p(cap)CO₂ values (mean 4 values per person) and 1,218 pairs of p(et)CO₂ and p(tc)CO₂ values (mean 55 values per person) could be evaluated. The difference of the pCO₂ values for two measurement methods revealed similar standard deviations in the Bland-Altman diagrams of about 2.5 mmHg for the 3 pairwise comparisons. The absolute measurement differences between p(et)CO₂ and p(tc)CO₂, p(cap)CO₂ and p(tc)CO₂ as well as p(et)CO₂ and p(cap)CO₂ were averaged for each single participant and afterwards across all individuals resulting in values of 2.0, 2.5 and 2.3 mmHg, respectively. When the baseline and hyperventilation periods were examined separately in this analysis they did not show any relevant differences. The individually determined delays of p(tc)CO₂ in regard to p(et)CO₂ averaged 53 s. The time delay exceeded 1 min in only two study participants.ConclusionsIn the presented hyperventilation experiment the agreement between the p(tc)CO₂ values and the p(et)CO₂ and p(cap)CO₂ measurements were comparable to the agreement between the latter two. Altogether, the comparability of the measurement methods seemed satisfactory. The delay between the time courses of p(et)CO₂ and p(tc)CO₂ of <1 min for most participants was short and is acceptable for clinical practice. Because only healthy subjects were tested these results might not be the same in children and critically ill patients and could differ from the presented results.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.