• Wender Figved, Stian Svenøy, Stephan M Röhrl, Jon Dahl, Lars Nordsletten, and Frede Frihagen.
• a Orthopaedic Department , Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust.
• Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct 1; 89 (5): 503-508.

AbstractBackground and purpose - The use of unipolar hemi-arthroplasties for femoral neck fractures is increasing in some countries due to reports of higher reoperation rates in bipolar prostheses. On the other hand, it has been proposed that bipolar hemiarthroplasties have clinical advantages and less cartilage wear than unipolar hemiarthroplasties. We compared cartilage wear between bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasties using radiostereometric analyses (RSA), in patients aged 70 years or older. Patients and methods - 28 ambulatory, lucid patients were randomized to treatment with a unipolar or a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for an acute femoral neck fracture. Migration of the prosthetic head into the acetabulum was measured using RSA. Secondary outcomes were Harris Hip Score (HHS), and EQ-5D scores. Patients were assessed at 3, 12. and 24 months. Results - 19 patients were available for follow-up at 2 years: mean proximal penetration was 0.83 mm in the unipolar group and 0.24 mm in the bipolar group (p = 0.01). Mean total point movement was 1.3 mm in the unipolar group and 0.95 mm in the bipolar group (p = 0.3). Median HHS was 78 (62-96) in the unipolar group and 100 (70-100) in the bipolar group (p = 0.004). Median EQ-5D Index Score was 0.73 (0.52-1.00) in the unipolar group and 1.00 (0.74-1.00) in the bipolar group (p = 0.01). Median EQ-5D VAS was 70 (50-90) in the unipolar group and 89 (70-95) in the bipolar group (p = 0.03) Interpretation - Patients with unipolar hemiarthroplasties had higher proximal cartilage wear and lower functional outcomes. Unipolar hemiarthroplasties should be used with caution in ambulatory, lucid patients.

26 keywords...

hide…