• Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss · Aug 2001

    Comparative Study

    [Arterial dysfunction after treatment of coarctation of the aorta].

    • Y Aggoun, D Sidi, and D Bonnet.
    • INSERM 0016 et service de cardiologie pédiatrique hôpital Necker-Enfants malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75743 Paris.
    • Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2001 Aug 1; 94 (8): 785-9.

    AbstractThe long term follow-up after successful coarctation repair has a late cardiovascular morbidity, includes systemic hypertension at rest or/and after exercise. The pathophysiology mechanisms responsible have not been well determined. We studied 70 normotensive subjects at rest (age, 14 +/- 5 y; pressure, 116 +/- 13/56 +/- 9 mmHg), who had an isolated coarctation with a good repair defined by the absence of gradient between upper and lower right limb (0.-26 mmHg). After exercise testing we defined two groups: Coa HT: Hypertension at exercise equal or over 200 mmHg, n = 20 (228 +/- 23 mmHg) and Coa HT: Normotensive at exercise = 10 (163 +/- 24 mmHg). These subjects were mached sex-age and blood pressure to 70 controls (age, 13 +/- 3 y; pressure, 115 +/- 10/56 +/- 6 mmHg). Using a high-resolution echographic technique, we assessed the systolic, diastolic diameter and the intima media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA) to define mechanical indexes: Cross sectional compliance (CSC), distensibility (CSD) and incremental elastic modulus (Einc) in each group. CCA pressure waveform and the local pulse pressure were determined in 32 subjects to define augmentation index (AI). The changes of the brachial artery diameter in response to reactive hyperaemia (flow mediated dilation: FDM) and to glyceryltrinitrate (GTNMD) were measured. The IMT was significantly increased in the Coa group (by 8%, p < 0.001) and higher in the Coa HT group compared with the Coa NT group (0.57 +/- 0.04 mm vs 0.54 +/- 0.05 mm, p < 0.05). The CSD was lower and the Einc was higher in both groups. The carotid pulse pressure amplitude was significantly higher in the Coa HT Group (41 +/- 14 vs 33 +/- 7 mmHg; p < 0.05). The AI was higher in both Coa repair groups. Both flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and GTN-mediated dilation (GTNMD) of the brachial artery were lower in the Coa group (respectively 5 +/- 3 vs 7 +/- 3%; p < 0.01; 16 +/- 8 vs 23 +/- 9%; p < 0.01). GTNMD was inversely correlated with maximum systolic blood pressure on exercise (r = 0.31, p = 0.03). The IMT of the CCA was related to the local pulse pressure in both groups of coarctation repair. The combination of distensibility decrease in the proximal arterial bed with an impairment of distal artery reactivity would account for the elevation of exercise blood pressure in subjects who had coarctation repair. The increase of local pulse pressure influences the carotid wall hypertrophy.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.