• Der Anaesthesist · Jan 2013

    Review

    [Anesthetist's briefing check. Tool to improve patient safety in the operating room].

    • H Trimmel, R Fitzka, J Kreutziger, and A von Goedecke.
    • Abteilung für Anästhesie, Notfall- und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin, Karl Landsteiner Institut für Medizinische Simulation und Patientensicherheit, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Österreich. helmut.trimmel@wienerneustadt.lknoe.at
    • Anaesthesist. 2013 Jan 1;62(1):53-60.

    AbstractAdverse events are not unusual in a more and more complex anesthesiological environment. The main reasons for this are an increasing workload, economic pressure, growing expectations of patients and deficits in planning and communication. However, these incidents mostly do not refer to medical deficits but to flaws in non-technical skills (team organisation, task orientation, decision making and communication). The introduction of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist depicted that a structural approach can improve the situation. However, it is still questionable if this measure is strong enough and recent publications revealed initial criticisms. Furthermore, remaining security gaps could be found even though the checklist was implemented in the anesthesiological practice of a big teaching hospital. Therefore, an additional checklist was developed to implement an anesthesia briefing in the daily routine. The main objective was to establish a security check before induction similar to the aeronautical pre-flight check. Additionally, this measure should improve coordination of the anesthesiology team. Working through the checklist, doctors and nurses are guided to focus on conjoint patient care prior to induction of anesthesia. In a web-based survey the general attitude of coworkers towards patient safety, as well as the acceptability of the new briefing check was scrutinised at two times: directly before implementation of the checklist and 1 year after. The results (84 % of medical and 97 % of healthcare staff answered the questionnaires) showed improvements with high relevance to parameters associated with awareness concerning safety issues and team coordination. In conclusion, it appears that patient safety can be significantly improved with little time effort of 3-5 min per patient. A prospective trial will be conducted to confirm the impact of this measure on improvements in patient safety.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…