• Transplant. Proc. · Mar 2015

    Efficacy and complications of enteral feeding tube insertion after liver transplantation.

    • J H Chun, J Y Ahn, H-Y Jung, H Jung Park, G H Kim, J H Lee, K-S Choi, K W Jung, D H Kim, K D Choi, H J Song, G H Lee, J H Kim, G W Song, and J-H Kim.
    • Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Digestive Disease Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
    • Transplant. Proc. 2015 Mar 1; 47 (2): 451-6.

    BackgroundAdequate nutritional support for patients undergoing major surgery significantly affects postoperative recovery. Data on enteral feeding after liver transplantation (LT) are scarce. The aim of this work was to determine the efficacy and complications of feeding tubes inserted with the use of fluoroscopic assistance, endoscopic assistance, or transperitoneal jejunostomy in patients who underwent LT.MethodsFrom January 2008 to August 2013, 2,058 LTs were performed at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Enteral feeding tubes were inserted in 155 patients (7.5%) after LT: with the use of fluoroscopic placement in 81 (52%), endoscopic placement in 49 (32%), and transperitoneal jejunostomy in 25 (16%). We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and complications of enteral feeding tubes.ResultsThe median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49-60). Enteral feeding indications were a high risk of gastric aspiration (n = 90), gastric stasis (n = 27), pneumonia (n = 23), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 12), and bowel rest (n = 3). Median enteral feeding durations were 14.5 days (IQR 8.0-30.7) for fluoroscopic placement, 20.0 days (IQR 8.0-40.0) for endoscopic placement, and 37.5 days (IQR 18.2-86.2) for transperitoneal jejunostomy. Times to establishment of oral feeding were 13.0 days (IQR 6.2-25.7) for fluoroscopic placement, 24.0 days (IQR 10.5-43.5) for endoscopic placement, and 37.0 days (IQR 17.0-64.2) for transperitoneal jejunostomy. After tube insertion, tube dislocation and blockage occurred in 34 patients (22%) and 16 patients (25%), respectively.ConclusionsEnteral feeding tube insertion in patients who can not maintain a nasogastric tube or start oral intake for a long time is important for nutritional support after LT. Proper feeding method selection according to patient condition can help patients by improving nutritional support after major operations such as LT.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…