• Medicine · Jan 2021

    Observational Study

    The self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community frontline staff during COVID-19 pandemic.

    • Yinghua Xia, Hao Zhang, Yingjie Xia, Hui Li, Lili Zhai, and Hong Wang.
    • Operating Department.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 22; 100 (3): e24140.

    AbstractThe present study was designed to determine the self-psychological safety maintenance and its influencing factors of community staff on the front-line during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.A total of 126 frontline staff in community were involved in the current cross-section study. Online questionnaires including the anxiety sensitivity index-3 (ASI-3), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), simple coping style questionnaire (SCSQ) and general self-efficacy scale (GSES) were utilized to analyze psychological state, coping style and self-efficacy of the surveyed staff.The ASI-3 standard score of 126 community frontline staff was 10.01 ± 2.82, of which 21 community frontline staff scored > 16, and the detection rate of anxiety was 16.67%. The anxiety state of doctors and nursing staff was significantly lower than that of administrative staff, logistics staff and other staff, and the rate of anxiety of having colleagues with suspected symptoms was significantly higher than that without colleagues with suspected symptoms (P < .05). The PHQ-9 standard score was 2.03 ± 0.16, of which 19 frontline staff in the community scored more than 5, and the detection rate of depression was 15.08%. Among them, the depression state of those with bachelor degree or above was significantly lower than that of those with junior college education, and the rate of depressive symptoms of community frontline staff with colleagues harboring suspected symptoms were significantly higher than those without colleagues with suspected symptoms (P < .05). The aggregated results showed that most of the community frontline staff in anxiety state group and depression group adopted negative coping style while most of the community frontline staff in the non-anxiety group and the non-depression group adopted positive coping style (P < .05). Additionally, lower score of self-efficacy of the community frontline staff was observed in the anxiety state group and the depression state group (P < .05).During the outbreak of COVID-19, several community frontline staff showed negative psychology of anxiety and depression, which could affect their coping style and self-efficacy. Early and effective psychological safety maintenance was required to alleviate the negative psychology of community frontline staff.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.