• Chest · Jul 2021

    Multicenter Study

    Shared Decision Making for Lung Cancer Screening: How Well are we "Sharing"?

    • NishiShawn P ESPEDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. Electronic address: spnishi@utmb.edu., Lisa ... more M Lowenstein, Tito R Mendoza, Maria A Lopez Olivo, Laura C Crocker, Karen Sepucha, Jiangong Niu, and Robert J Volk. less
    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. Electronic address: spnishi@utmb.edu.
    • Chest. 2021 Jul 1; 160 (1): 330-340.

    BackgroundLung cancer screening (LCS) reduces lung cancer mortality, but it also carries a range of risks. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of engaging patients in their health care decisions and is a vital component of LCS.Research QuestionWhat is the quality of SDM among patients recently assessed for LCS?Study Design And MethodsCross-sectional study of screened patients recruited from two academic tertiary care centers in the South Central Region of the United States. Self-reported surveys assessed patient demographics, values related to outcomes of LCS, knowledge, SDM components including receipt of educational materials, and decisional conflict.ResultsRecently screened patients (n = 266) possessed varied LCS knowledge, answering an average of 41.4% of questions correctly. Patients valued finding cancer early over concerns about harms. Patients indicated that LCS benefits were presented to them by a health care provider far more often than harms (68.3% vs 20.8%, respectively), and 30.7% reported they received educational materials about LCS during the screening process. One-third of patients had some decisional conflict (33.6%) related to their screening decisions, whereas most patients (86.6%) noted that they were involved in the screening decision as much as they wanted. In multivariate models, non-White race and having less education were related to lower knowledge scores. Non-White patients and former smokers were more likely to be conflicted about the screening decision. Most patients (n = 227 [85.3%]) indicated that a health care provider had discussed smoking cessation or abstinence with them.InterpretationAmong recently screened patients, the quality of decision-making about LCS is highly variable. The low use of educational materials including decision aids and imbalance of conveying benefit vs risk information to patients is concerning. A structured approach using decision aids may assist with providing a balanced presentation of information and may improve the quality of SDM.Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.