• Daniel Sidalak, Eve Purdy, S Luckett-Gatopoulos, Heather Murray, Brent Thoma, and Teresa M Chan.
• D. Sidalak is a medical student, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. E. Purdy is an emergency medicine resident, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. S. Luckett-Gatopoulos is an emergency medicine resident, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. H. Murray is associate professor of emergency medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. B. Thoma is clinical assistant professor of emergency medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. T. Chan is assistant professor of emergency medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
• Acad Med. 2017 Feb 1; 92 (2): 201-204.

ProblemPublishing in academic journals is challenging for learners. Those who pass the initial stages of internal review by an editor often find the anonymous peer review process harsh. Academic blogs offer alternate avenues for publishing medical education material. Many blogs, however, lack a peer review process, which some consumers argue compromises the quality of materials published.ApproachCanadiEM (formerly BoringEM) is an academic educational emergency medicine blog dedicated to publishing high-quality materials produced by learners (i.e., residents and medical students). The editorial team has designed and implemented a collaborative "coached peer review" process that comprises an open exchange among the learner-author, editors, and reviewers. The goal of this process is to facilitate the publication of high-quality academic materials by learner-authors while providing focused feedback to help them develop academic writing skills.OutcomesThe authors of this Innovation Report surveyed (February-June 2015) their blog's learner-authors and external expert "staff" reviewers who had participated in coached peer review for their reactions to the process. The survey results revealed that participants viewed the process positively compared with both traditional journal peer review and academic blog publication processes. Participants found the process friendly, easy, efficient, and transparent. Learner-authors also reported increased confidence in their published material. These outcomes met the goals of coached peer review.Next StepsCanadiEM aims to inspire continued participation in, exposure to, and high-quality production of academic writing by promoting the adoption of coached peer review for online educational resources produced by learners.

17 keywords...

hide…