• Spine · Nov 2014

    Magnetic resonance perfusion characteristics of hypervascular renal and hypovascular prostate spinal metastases: clinical utilities and implications.

    • Atin Saha, Kyung K Peck, Eric Lis, Andrei I Holodny, Yoshiya Yamada, and Sasan Karimi.
    • Departments of *Radiology †Medical Physics; and ‡Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
    • Spine. 2014 Nov 15; 39 (24): E1433-40.

    Study DesignA total of 40 patients with spinal metastases from renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) or prostate carcinomas (PCs) were studied using DCE-MRI (dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging).ObjectiveTo evaluate spinal metastases from RCC and PC to assess the sensitivity and specificity of perfusion parameters obtained by quantitative and semiquantitative methods, which would allow for noninvasive discrimination between hypovascular and hypervascular lesions.Summary Of Background DataConventional MRI can be inconclusive in assessing diagnostically complex spinal lesions in patients with cancer in whom fibrosis, infarction, edema related to compression fractures, and infection may simulate malignant neoplasm. Conventional MRI is also of limited value in assessing tumor vascularity and identifying hypervascular tumors. DCE-MRI offers an advantage over conventional MRI in that it provides anatomical, physiological, and hemodynamic information about neoplastic lesions.MethodsDCE perfusion parameters: vascular permeability, plasma volume (V(p)), wash-in slope, and peak-enhancement parameter were measured to assess their potential as discriminators of tumor vascularity. A Mann-Whitney U test (at P ≤ 0.01), was performed to quantify and compare significance of perfusion parameters between the 2 groups.ResultsOf the 4 perfusion parameters studied, V(p) was observed to have the largest difference in mean (μ) between PC (μ = 3.29/s) and RCC metastases (μ = 5.92/s). This was followed by the peak-enhancement, vascular permeability, and wash-in parameters. A Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference between V(p) values for PC and RCC lesions (P ≤ 0.001). Similarly, peak-enhancement parameter showed a significant difference between the 2 histologies (P ≤ 0.001), as did vascular permeability (P ≤ 0.01). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that V(p) recorded the highest area under the curve (0.867).ConclusionV(p) was shown to be the best discriminator between spinal metastases from PC and RCC with the mean V(p) of RCC metastasis being 1.8 times that of the PC lesions, thus discriminating between hyper- and hypovascular metastases, which has important clinical implications.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.