• Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) · May 1987

    Comparative Study

    [Histologically controlled comparison of palpation and sonography in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases].

    • T Eichhorn, H G Schroeder, H Glanz, and W B Schwerk.
    • Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1987 May 1; 66 (5): 266-74.

    AbstractDuring a period of 2 1/2 years palpation and high-resolution real-time sonography were carried out in 83 non-selected patients with head and neck carcinomas to diagnose metastatic involvement of cervical lymph nodes. The findings were compared with the results of the microscopic examination of the lymph nodes from the neck dissection specimen. Sonography is characterized by a high sensitivity in the detection of lymph node metastases. The relatively low specificity of this method proves that many enlarged but not metastatically involved lymph nodes are also displayed by ultrasound. Although there are no specific echomorphological criteria permitting a reliable identification of lymph node metastases, their sonographic visibility cannot be determined only by the size of the lymph node. Lymph node metastases less than 1.5 cm in diameter, in particular, can be detected more often by ultrasound than by palpation. Therefore, it can be presumed that pathological transformations besides the reactive hyperplasia occurring during metastatic involvement will also influence the echographic representation of lymph nodes. The accuracy data of other methods used for detecting lymph node metastases (computed tomography and lymphoscintigraphy) were compiled from the literature and compared with those of palpation in more than 5000 patients. Basing on our experiences with sonography in this field we tried to assess the chances and limitations of ultrasound in the pretherapeutic diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…