• J Burn Care Rehabil · Sep 1996

    Comparative Study

    Positive self-regard as a coping mechanism for pediatric burn survivors.

    • J M LeDoux, W J Meyer, P Blakeney, and D Herndon.
    • Shriners Burn Institute, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.
    • J Burn Care Rehabil. 1996 Sep 1; 17 (5): 472-6; discussion 471-2.

    AbstractPediatric burn survivors are reported to present optimistic pictures of themselves; it has been suggested that their reports of high self-esteem may reflects a coping mechanism. The purpose of this study was to compare burned children's self-perceptions of competence and adequacy to normative population with the use of two standardized instruments. A random sample of 32 pediatric burn survivors was administered two standardized instruments: the Piers-Harris and the Harter Self-Perception Profiles for children and adolescents. Paired t tests revealed significantly higher self-concepts by the burned children than the nonclinical reference groups on five of the six Piers-Harris clusters and on two of the nine Harter Self-Perception Profiles domains. Also, the relationship between the children's perceived self-worth in each domain, and the importance they attributed to that domain, indicate that the burned children are satisfied with themselves in those areas they perceive as important. Results from both tests suggest that the burn survivors' report of positive self-esteem may reflect a necessary defense mechanism in the adjustment process, which should be supported by the burn team.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…