• The Prostate · Jan 2005

    Diagnostic validity of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in serum of patients with prostate cancer: a re-evaluation.

    • Anja Michael, Carsten Stephan, Glen Kristiansen, Mick Burckhardt, Stefan A Loening, Dietmar Schnorr, and Klaus Jung.
    • Department of Urology, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Schumann-strasse 20/21, D-10098 Berlin, Germany
    • Prostate. 2005 Jan 1; 62 (1): 34-9.

    BackgroundRecent studies suggest that macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in serum is of prognostic significance for prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate this hypothesis.MethodsSerum MIF levels were measured in healthy men (n = 86), untreated patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH; n = 50), prostate cancer (PCa; n = 163), and after radical prostatectomy for 3 days (n = 5). PCa patients were classified according to the TNM system and the WHO grading scale. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were additionally determined.ResultsThe MIF concentrations of healthy men and BPH patients did not differ (mean +/- SD, 2.08 +/- 1.08 microg/L vs. 2.04 +/- 1.08 microg/L), whereas the mean value of MIF in PCa patients was significantly decreased (1.77 +/- 1.12 microg/L). There was no any correlation between MIF and PSA (r(s) = -0.049, P = 0.271). MIF concentrations in patients with T1 tumors were higher than in those with T2 tumors (2.29 +/- 1.26 vs. 1.67 +/- 1.11 microg/L; P = 0.044). No any effect of grading was observed. After prostatectomy, the changes of PSA and MIF were not always concordant as MIF partly increased while PSA continuously decreased. Analyses of receiver-operating curves and logistic regressions did not show that MIF alone or MIF related variables (MIF/tPSA; fPSA/(tPSA x MIF); fPSA x MIF/tPSA) could improve specificity or sensitivity to detect prostate cancer in comparison to total PSA.ConclusionSerum MIF alone or MIF to PSA related variables did not seem suitable for providing additional information on PCa patients. That re-evaluated diagnostic validity of MIF was in contrast to results by another group shown previously.Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.