-
- Katsuhisa Yamada, Manabu Ito, Toshiyuki Akazawa, Masaru Murata, Toru Yamamoto, and Norimasa Iwasaki.
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, North-15, West-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan. yka2q@yahoo.co.jp.
- Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov 1; 24 (11): 2530-7.
PurposeTo evaluate the osteoconductivity and the bonding strength of the newly developed interbody cage covered with the porous titanium sheet (porous Ti cage) to vertebral bodies in a sheep model.MethodsTwelve sheep underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L2-3 and L4-5 using either the new porous Ti cages (Group-P) or conventional Ti cages with autogenous iliac bone (Group-C). The animals were euthanized at 2 or 4 months postoperatively and subjected to radiological, biomechanical, and histological examinations.ResultsComputed tomography analyses showed that the ratio of bone contact area in Group-P was significantly increased at 4 months compared with that at 2 months (p = 0.01). Although the ratio of bone contact area in Group-C was significantly higher than Group-P at 2 months (p < 0.001), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at 4 months. Biomechanical test showed that there was no significant difference in bonding strength between the two groups at either 2 or 4 months. Histological analyses revealed that the bone apposition ratio increased significantly with time in Group-P (p < 0.001). Although Group-C showed significantly higher bone apposition ratio than Group-P at 2 months (p = 0.001), there was no statistical difference between the two groups at 4 months.ConclusionsThere was bone ingrowth into the porous Ti sheet, and bonding capacity of the porous Ti cage to the host bone increased with time. However, the speed of union to the bone with a porous Ti cage was marginally lower than a conventional cage along with an autogenous bone graft. Although it needs further experiment with a larger sample size, the results of the current study suggested that this material could achieve interbody fusion without the need for bone grafts.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.