• J Orthop Trauma · Feb 2011

    Comparative Study

    Surgical treatment of extra-articular or simple intra-articular distal tibial fractures: external fixation versus intramedullary nailing.

    • Jukka Ristiniemi, Patrik Luukinen, and Pasi Ohtonen.
    • Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. Jukka.Ristiniemi@ppshp.fi
    • J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Feb 1; 25 (2): 101-5.

    ObjectiveTo compare intramedullary nailing (IMN) with external fixation (EF) in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures located within 5 cm of the ankle.SettingUniversity teaching hospital.DesignRetrospective comparative study.PatientsSixty-seven patients with a mean age of 48 years (range, 16-78 years; 24 women, 43 men).InterventionThirty-three fractures were treated with EF from 1998 to 2004 and 34 fractures were treated with reamed IMN from 2004 to 2007.Main Outcome MeasuresOlerud-Molander ankle score, RAND-36 Item Health Survey, and the number of secondary interventions.ResultsThe healing time was 21 weeks in the IMN group and 23 weeks in the EF group (P = 0.53). One fracture in the IMN group and three in the EF group malunited (P = 0.62). Olerud-Molander ankle score was 75 in the IMN group and 74 in the EF group (P = 0.51). There was no difference in any of the RAND-36 subscores measuring physical functioning. More patients in the EF group had secondary intervention resulting from delayed healing (8 versus 1, P = 0.03). The patients in the EF group also needed more secondary interventions as a result of any complication (15 versus 2, P < 0.001). There was one deep infection in the IMN group.ConclusionDistal extra-articular or simple intra-articular fractures can be treated with modern IMNs or nonbridging EF. Although functional results are similar, EF carries a significant greater risk of secondary interventions; based on these data, IMN is recommended.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…