• Marie Bergez, Nicolas Fritsch, David Tran-Van, Tahar Saghi, Tan Bounkim, Ariane Gentile, Philippe Labadie, Bruno Fontaine, Alexandre Ouattara, and Hadrien Rozé.
• Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Robert Picque Military Teaching Hospital, Villenave d'Ornon, France.
• Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jul 16; 9 (1): 81.

BackgroundAlthough lung protection with low tidal volume and limited plateau pressure (Pplat) improves survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (ARDS), the best way to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is still debated.MethodsThis study aimed to compare two strategies using individual PEEP based on a maximum Pplat (28-30 cmH2O, the Express group) or on keeping end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure positive (0-5 cmH2O, PLexpi group). We estimated alveolar recruitment (Vrec), end-expiratory lung volume and alveolar distension based on elastance-related end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL,EL).ResultsNineteen patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg) were included with a baseline PEEP of 7.0 ± 1.8 cmH2O and a PaO2/FiO2 of 91.2 ± 31.2 mmHg. PEEP and oxygenation increased significantly from baseline with both protocols; PEEP Express group was 14.2 ± 3.6 cmH2O versus 16.7 ± 5.9 cmH2O in PLexpi group. No patient had the same PEEP with the two protocols. Vrec was higher with the latter protocol (299 [0 to 875] vs. 222 [47 to 483] ml, p = 0.049) and correlated with improved oxygenation (R2 = 0.45, p = 0.002). Two and seven patients in the Express and PL,expi groups, respectively, had PL,EL > 25 cmH2O.ConclusionsThere is a great heterogeneity of PLexpi when Pplat is used to titrate PEEP but with limited risk of over-distension. A PEEP titration for a moderate positive level of PLexpi might slightly improve alveolar recruitment and oxygenation but increases the risk of over-distension in one-third of patients.

4 keywords...

hide…